Algorithmic decision making:
To what extent can due process principles assist in protecting Individuals from the threat of algocracy

Michael Camilleri’s dissertation at the University of Edinburgh explores the degree to which traditional mechanisms of government can integrate algorithmic decision-making without violating due process principles.

The author argues that the crucial question here is whether the legislature should allow the courts to tackle the ‘unique’ aspects of these threats or whether it is necessary to legislate.

He concludes that this dissertation highlights the threats of algocracy not to argue that the use of algorithmic decision-making systems by public bodies should be barred but acknowledges that there are ethical and legal problems that need addressing.